Friday, March 29, 2013

Happy Birthday Mama




Happy Birthday Mama I love and miss you so very much. Not a day goes by that I do not think of you. 

You are now gone, but never forgotten. There is no way I could ever be who I am today without you and your impact on my life. I have made mistakes at times, but they were never enough for you to stop loving me. Everyone says what a good girl I am and what a great daughter I was to you for taking care of you while you were sick, buy it was you that cared for me while I was a baby and I just returned the favor. That is the cycle of life you have children and care for them and in the end when you become sick or old and feeble the kids take care of you. Well that is how I see it, so I never did anything that you didn't do for me or that my children someday would not do for me or I should hope. I regret nothing of the 10 months I took off to care for you I was blessed to be able to be there everyday as you finally left this world better than how you found it, and put your mark on this world. I know it is there I can see it each time I look in the mirror. 



I think we look a lot alike, I love this picture and the story behind it



This was you wedding day and in this picture you were looking at the pearls daddy bought for you to wear I have heard this story a thousand times as you waited in one of the "Sunday School Rooms" of paw-paw's church. You had to wait 45 minutes for daddy to arrive and you were nervous that he had got cold feet and left you at the alter, but daddy woke up late from his bachelor party the night before and was rushing everyone. He made it mama and although he had false he loved you until the day you died and so did I






Mama you are everything I want to be in a woman. You rode your own bike when there were not many bikers. You never took any BS off of a man, but was kind and considerate to those you loved, you loved your bike, animals, mudding, 4-wheeling, hunting, fishing and you always stood up for your friends and family. But, though it all you were a eloquent lady, you were beautiful, sexy at parties and yes men turned there heads, but you could dress in leather or camo and look just as pretty. You mama were a true "Southern Belle"


I pray that you are looking down on us today and can feel the love coming your way.

To the best mom ever I love you. 


K2, Spice linked to kidney failure in children




Synthetic marijuana known as K2 or Spice is appealing to teens. You can often go to the corner gas station and find it in pot pourri-like products and by smoking it you can get an intense high. It’s of course unregulated and who knows what’s in it.

Many teens have had serious adverse reactions to it including racing heart beat, high blood pressure, hallucinations, and paranoia. ERs have been inundated with kids who have been unwittingly exposed thinking it wasn't any different than pot or perhaps less risky because it was over the counter. In actuality, K2 may be riskier than pot.

Recently over a dozen teens who have had no history of kidney problems in the past and who had no other drug exposure besides Spice or K2 went into kidney failure after smoking it. A couple of the teens died and several others needed to undergo dialysis while their kidneys recovered from the assault.

I understand that teens are inherently stupid in this way: they don’t ever think that anything bad will happen to them even if they understand it can happen. They don’t think that if they text and drive they’ll get in an accident; they don’t think they’ll fail the test that they’ll fail since they sort of listened mostly in class. Teens are also known for experimentation. They try new hairstyles and music genres and attitudes, and sometimes they even want to try something dangerous just to see how it feels.

K2 or Spice is particularly dangerous. I encourage parents to talk to their teens about it realistically, but also with an understanding that some experimentation with something is likely to happen. Try to deflect it away from this and toward something else. Like a new hairstyle.






Changing TV content improves preschoolers' behavior, study finds





Preschoolers love to pretend. They play dress up or imagine they’re pirates or “cook” for you. They “fly” and “drive” and even are able to become “invisible. “Their powers are endless. Often they find it difficult to differentiate what is real from what is not, but by early grade school, most children have a pretty good understanding of reality and fiction.


It makes sense that what preschoolers hear and see in books and media can influence greatly how they play. It is fodder for their imaginations and feeds it. If they see certain types of behaviors over and over they begin to think that those behaviors are normal or at least desirable. It can be tricky as parents to choose content that is both interesting and imaginative but not scary or full of conflict, either physical or verbal, for preschoolers to watch. Many cartoons and other programs ostensibly geared for young children show “‘good guys” and “bad guys” or kids bad mouthing or putting another child down as part of the dynamic. Even if the “good guys” or “good kids” end up winning, the images viewed and words heard are those of conflict and/or aggression and that can affect behavior.


In a recent study published in Pediatrics, researchers in Ma  tried something new. Instead of just asking parents in one group to turn off their TVs or significantly limit the preschoolers’ screen time in the study (the AAP’s recommendation for children in this age group) they asked instead for half of the parents to change the content the children watched, leaving the amount of time the children were in front of a TV the same as it always had been. The other half of the study participants did not change the amount of time or the content they watched. The two halves were very similar in both the content and amount of TV watched prior to the intervention as well as other family characteristics, amount of time in daycare, etc. The intervention group was instructed to replace their content with the following shows: “Dora the Explorer,” “Sesame Street,” and “Super Why” and to a lesser extent “The Mickey Mouse Clubhouse,” “Sid the Science Kid,” and “Curious George.” These shows were chosen because of their prosocial behavioral messages. The first three shows strongly so and the latter three somewhat less strongly so. The study groups were then assessed 6 and 12 months later and the differences were significant between the two groups. The group exposed to prosocial TV had better social interactions and behaviors at home and in group settings. The preschoolers were less apt to be described as anxious, depressed, withdrawn, oppositional, aggressive, or angry compared to the control group. Low income boys were particularly likely to show a benefit.


To be honest, I've never been a big fan of TV for kids. I feel that there’s a whole bunch of other things that are more productive and creative that children can be doing with their time but I realize that most kids will be spending a couple of hours a day (at least apparently) watching television. These pediatricians did a great service then to investigate what content is best. If you’re going to have your preschooler watch TV, at least have him watch something prosocial at this age rather than something more pro-aggressive like Cartoon Network’s “Star Wars” or even more neutral like Nickelodeon’s “SpongeBob Squarepants.”



Tanning booths are risky




I know it’s obvious and yet I feel I needed to do a blog about it with Spring Break and prom approaching. Every year I seen teenagers in the office who are unnaturally tan before for this time of year and the only way that can happen around here is if they are visiting a tanning salon.


Let me let you know one thing: there is no ‘safe’ tanning. I like the sun as much as anyone, maybe more, but going to a tanning salon before prom or spring break is not a good idea. The good news is that at least Michigan requires parental consent for a minor to use a commercial tanning booth, 17 other states do not. Children as young as 10 can use tanning booths in states like Missouri without any parent consent at all.


When your teenager asks for consent to go to the local tanning salon before spring break or prom ‘look healthy’ or ‘get her base tan’ so she doesn't burn, remind her that this sort of exposure has risks. Even with sunscreen, melanoma, basal cell, and squamous cell cancers can all grow and the risk is cumulative. I understand that we don’t want to avoid the sun altogether, of course, but going indoors to a booth to sit in a coffin-like tube with lights to tan isn't at all the same as enjoying the water or a bike ride or a hike while you also happen to be in the sun (with sunscreen on!)


Be strong parents! Your teenager needs your consent to go in Michigan so you have the opportunity to minimize their risk!

  This parent went to jail for tanning her 6 year old daughter 







BE CAREFUL I TOO TAN, BUT WE MUST USE COMMON SENSE AND GUILD LINES TO 
PROTECT OURSELVES



Anyone can anonymously report suspected abuse




Recently we've had a couple of cases in the office that made me realize that parents don’t know that they can anonymously report concerns they have about child abuse or neglect just like I have to do as a pediatrician.

Here are some examples of situations that might warrant a parent calling the state to report a concern:

Neighbor children ages 4 and 7 are often left alone for more than an hour at a time. They come over to your house to play with your children but don’t seem like they've had a bath in several days. Their clothes don’t seem clean and don’t fit too well. When they are over they often seem very hungry and want to stay as long as possible. The parents are hard to get a hold of. They seem nice enough when you walk the children back home but almost daily the children seem to end up at your house because their parents aren't around for some stretch of time.

Your 4 year old tells you that an older child had repeatedly asked to see her private parts. She wasn't sure what to do and so she did what he said. The older child has touched her vagina on several occasions and has shown her his penis as well. You confront the 8 year old’s parents who don’t seem to think this is a big deal at all.

You hear your neighbors repeatedly yelling at each other and swearing. You hear them calling each other names and yelling derogatory things at the children too. At one point you hear one of the children yelling in fear “Don’t hit me again! Please don’t hit me! I’ll stop! I’ll never do it again!”

All of these situations are pretty straightforward and in reality you don’t even need this much to go on. As an adult, if your radar is up and you are concerned about the well being of a child, you can call the state and anonymously report your concern. I know that we often don’t want to meddle or get involved in other people’s lives but when children’s lives and well being are at risk, you have a responsibility to do something. It truly is anonymous.

Unless the case goes to trial and you need to testify as to what you saw or heard, no one will know it was you who called. There is a hassle and headache for the family that has a case opened of course but if there is something amiss, it is an opportunity for them to get help if needed and if real dysfunction is present get the kids to a place of safety and care.

If you suspect a child is at risk of abuse or neglect, I encourage all adults — whether or not you’re a mandatory reporter like a doctor or a teacher




Starting foods earlier





Over the last 13 years so much has changed. Back in 2000, the AAP recommended that children not start milk or dairy until age 1, eggs until 2, and things like peanut butter and fish shouldn't be started until age 3 or later in the hopes of decreasing food allergy. Boy how times have changed.

Over the intervening years, food allergies in children have risen and we've also had the benefit of a ton of research which, in the end, has resulted in an almost complete reversal of the above recommendations. Both clinical experience and research has borne out that delaying highly allergenic foods actually increases the risk of food allergy it seems for most children. As a result, the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology came out this week with new recommendations that two highly allergenic foods, peanut butter and fish, be given between 4 and 6 months of age to decrease the chance of food allergy. By introducing these foods early and often, you build tolerance and familiarity which helps minimize risk of allergy.

It can be challenging as a parent when you go online or look in books to get guidance about introducing solids. Many sources still suggest waiting until 6 months for any foods while others suggests delaying all allergenic foods until a year of age at least. This advice is no longer up to date and may indeed be increasing the risk of food allergies.

The tide is changing when it comes to feeding infants. Starting early, giving a broad variety of foods and not avoiding allergenic foods is the new norm. It’s actually a return to old school….my baby book shows me eating cottage cheese at about 2 months old! (Well maybe we shouldn't go quite back to that.)



Proper Swaddling of Babies to Prevent Hip Dysplasia






In ten years of pediatrics I have only had a handful of cases of hip dysplasia. Hip dysplasia is when the hip joint (a ball and socket joint) does not develop appropriately and can lead to dislocation and improper development which in turn can lead to mobility issues in the future. Mostly, I have seen this occur in breech babies (legs are in funny positions in the womb), females (hip anatomy makes it have a higher propensity for issues than males), first born babies (the womb is tightest in the first pregnancy leaving less room for the baby and his/her hips), and low amniotic fluid (less room in the womb).

Recent evidence indicates that improper swaddling may contribute to hip dysplasia. Like other parts of the baby, the hip continues to develop and mature even after the baby is born. Proper assessment of the above risk factors and routine physical exams by your pediatrician can catch infants who have hip dysplasia. Parents can do their part in minimizing risks by using proper swaddling techniques which will allow for proper maturation of the hip joints.

The below information is from the International Hip Dysplasia Institute. There is a link embedded in the text that takes you to their web page where 3 different techniques for proper swaddling are demonstrated in a YouTube video. Although the risks with most current swaddling techniques are minimal, this intervention carries no side effects, incurs no costs, and is easy to do - so there is no reason not to try it!


Hip-Healthy Swaddling

Are you swaddling your baby properly?



Improper swaddling may lead to hip dysplasia or developmental dysplasia of the hip. When in the womb the baby's legs are in a fetal position with the legs bent up and across each other. Sudden straightening of the legs to a standing position can loosen the joints and damage the soft cartilage of the socket.

Many parents find that swaddling can provide comfort for fussy babies, reduce crying, and develop more settled sleep patterns. When babies are swaddled, care should be taken to swaddle properly so the baby is safe and healthy.

There are many ways to swaddle babies by using blankets or commercial products designed for swaddling. In order for swaddling to allow healthy hip development, the legs should be able to bend up and out at the hips. This position allows for natural development of the hip joints.

The baby’s legs should not be tightly wrapped straight down and pressed together. Swaddling infants with the hips and knees in an extended position may increase the risk of hip dysplasia and dislocation.


Instructions on how to swaddle properly

Watch the video at this link to learn three, hip-healthy methods to swaddle your baby:

If you can't view the above video, here is one of the methods described in text:

1. If using a square cloth, fold back one corner creating a straight edge.

2. Place the baby on the cloth so that the top of the fabric is at shoulder level. If using a rectangular cloth, the baby's shoulders will be placed at the top of the long side.

3. Bring the left arm down. Wrap the cloth over the arm and chest. Tuck under the right side of the baby.

4. Bring the right arm down and wrap the cloth over the baby's arm and chest.

5. Tuck the cloth under the left side of the baby. The weight of the baby will hold the cloth firmly in place.

6. Twist or fold the bottom end of the cloth and tuck behind the baby, ensuring that both legs are bent up and out.

It is important to leave room for the hips to move.


What about sleep sacks and commercial products?

Some parents choose to wrap their babies in sleep sacks specifically designed for swaddling, instead of using a simple cloth or blanket. Commercial products for swaddling should have a loose pouch or sack for the baby’s legs and feet, allowing plenty of hip movement. However, even some of these commercial products can confine the legs if they are tightened around the thighs.

It's especially important to allow the hips to spread apart and bend up. In the womb the legs are in a fetal position with the legs bent up across each other. Sudden straightening of the legs to a standing position can loosen the joints and damage the soft cartilage of the socket.


Final Thoughts

When put down to sleep, a swaddled baby should be placed on his or her back, face up.

If the baby can roll onto his or her stomach this may increase the risk of suffocation. Seek the advice of your child’s healthcare provider if swaddling an older or more active baby.



http://www.hipdysplasia.org/Developmental-Dysplasia-Of-The-Hip/Hip-Healthy-Swaddling







When Should I Send My Sick Kid Back To School?




School and daycare criteria are often overly restrictive in their back to school policy for sick kids. This can unnecessarily hamper the education of your child without benefiting the health of the other kids in his/her classroom.

Below is an excellent article highlighting policy from the American Academy of Pediatrics that helps parents (and doctors) understand when exclusion does and does not make sense.

AAP Updates Guidelines for Infectious Disease Exclusions

Pediatric News Volume 44 Issue 2 February 2009

DIANA MAHONEY (New England Bureau)

Conjunctivitis: It's red, it's itchy, it's crusty, but it is not—repeat NOT—cause for automatic exclusion from day care or school, according to the latest edition of the American Academy of Pediatrics' “Managing Infectious Diseases in Child Care and Schools.”

The rationale behind this seemingly revolutionary recommendation is the fact that neither treatment nor exclusion of children with conjunctivitis from group settings reduces the spread of infection, Dr. Laura A. Jana discussed at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

The same goes for many of the common childhood infections that incite knee-jerk reactions among schools, day care providers, and parents.

“Multiple studies have shown that most viruses are spread by children who seem well, which means that exposure happens before the school or day care facility can make the first phone call for the child to be picked up,” said Dr. Jana, a pediatrician and owner of a child care facility in Omaha, Neb.

So while conventional wisdom says that automatically excluding kids with conjunctivitis, fever, and stomachaches will prevent the spread of these infections, “the evidence doesn't back this up,” she said, noting that “hand and surface hygiene continue to be the best way to reduce infections in group care.”

The confusion regarding exclusion is understandable, said Dr. Jana. Unlike the best-practice guidelines issued in 2002 by the AAP, American Public Health Association, and others, state guidelines for exclusion from child care or school lack detail, are not based on medical evidence, and vary considerably by state.

“Most states do not require center and school policies to follow national guidelines, and individual exclusion policies must only comply with state licensing, which means children are often excluded for harmless conditions,” she said. The consequences of inappropriate exclusion policies and practices, she added, include excess health care visits, antibiotic-seeking behavior, and lost work and school time.

The one exclusion criterion from the national guidelines that is excluded most frequently, according to Dr. Jana, is the directive that a child should be excluded if the illness prevents him or her from participating comfortably in activities. “This child should really be at home,” she said. “Additionally, a child should be excluded from school or day care if the illness results in greater care than the staff can provide,” she noted, or if the illness poses a risk of spreading a harmful disease to others. (See box below.)

The common cold, for example, does not warrant exclusion, “unless the child is too uncomfortable to participate in routine daily activities,” Dr. Jana said. “The virus itself can be spread before, during, and well after the time of symptoms, so preventing a child's attendance won't significantly reduce the chance of spread.”

The updated “Managing Infectious Diseases in Child Care and Schools” (Elk Grove Village, Ill.: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2008), also recommends against exclusion for the following conditions that often incite red flags, according to Dr. Jana:

? Hand, foot, and mouth disease. “Children should not be excluded unless they have sores in their mouth with drooling or if the rash is associated with fever or behavior change,” Dr. Jana explained. “Good hygiene is the best way to minimize the opportunity for the spread of this common virus.”

? Fifth disease. Because there is little virus present when the telltale rash appears, exclusion has no preventive benefit.

? Draining skin infection, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. “Because of the media attention surrounding MRSA, there's a lot of anxiety about this, but the reality is, these children should be excluded only if the infection is accompanied by fever, pain, or behavior change,” said Dr. Jana. “There is no need for the caregiver to request a culture, because it won't affect how the infection will be handled. Some kids without symptoms have MRSA, and there is no good way to eradicate the germ yet from individuals, families, or classrooms.”

? Diarrhea. According to the revised guidelines, diapered children with diarrhea may remain in care if the diarrhea is contained in the diaper and the child has no more than two stools above normal baseline. “This is a departure from the previous recommendation that all diapered children be excluded until the diarrhea resolves or is deemed noninfectious,” said Dr. Jana. Children who are able to use the toilet may remain in care with good hand washing, as long as they don't have accidents. “Exclusion is appropriate for children with blood in their stool not explained by medication, hard stool, or diet,” she said.

? Vomiting. Exclusion is recommended for a child who has had two or more episodes of vomiting in the previous 24 hours and continuing exclusion until the vomiting resolves or a health care provider determines the cause is not contagious.

? Fever. “Children with fever should not be excluded automatically, unless the fever is accompanied by behavior change or other signs or symptoms of illness,” explained Dr. Jana. The exception to this is children younger than 4 months old with unexplained fever.

? Respiratory illness. Most respiratory illnesses do not require exclusion; however, a child with persistent coughing or trouble breathing should be evaluated for pneumonia, asthma, or serious respiratory infection, such as whooping cough.

? Earache, no fever. “This child should be excluded if he or she requires more care than the staff can reasonably provide,” said Dr. Jana. “Often, these kids are in a lot of pain and cannot participate in routine activities.”

? Lice. “Lice are a nuisance, but they're not a health hazard,” said Dr. Jana. “Children with lice should be excluded, but they don't have to be sent home right away. It can wait until the end of the day, and they can return once treatment occurs,” she said.

“Of course, all of these are recommendations, and while they are based in evidence, they are not binding,” Dr. Jana concluded.

Revised ‘When to Exclude’ Criteria

With the exception of the noted updates, most of the exclusion criteria outlined in the revised “Managing Infectious Diseases in Child Care and Schools” are consistent with the national illness exclusion guidelines published jointly in 2002 by the AAP, APHA, the Maternal and Child Health Bureau, and the National Resource Center for Health and Safety in Child Care. These include:

? Tuberculosis, until an appropriate health care provider or health official certifies that the child is in appropriate therapy and can attend care.

? Impetigo, until 24 hours after treatment has been initiated.

? Chickenpox until all sores have dried and crusted (usually 6 days).

? Mumps, until 9 days after an onset of parotid gland swelling.

? Hepatitis A virus, until 1 week after an onset of illness or jaundice or as directed by the health department.

? Measles, until 4 days after an onset of rash.

? Rubella, until 6 days after an onset of rash.

? Fever, when accompanied by behavior changes or other symptoms such as a sore throat, rash, vomiting, diarrhea, earache, etc.

? Diarrhea (frequent, runny, watery stools).

? Blood in the stool not explained by dietary change, medication, or hard stool.

? Vomiting two or more times in a 24-hour period.

? Body rash with fever.

? Sore throat with fever and swollen glands or mouth sores with drooling.

? Severe coughing with the child getting red or blue in the face or making a high-pitched whooping sound after coughing.

? Persistent abdominal pain (more than 2 hours) or intermittent pain with other signs and symptoms.

? Signs of possible severe illness such as irritability, unusual tiredness, or neediness that compromises caregivers' ability to care for others.

? Uncontrolled coughing or wheezing, continuous crying, or difficulty breathing.